Bridging Ethics and Regulation: A Conceptual Framework for Governing Generative AI in Higher Education

Authors

  • Christian Roberto Cabezas Freire Armed Forces of Ecuador Author
  • Nayana Desai Upgrad (India) image/svg+xml , Edgewood University image/svg+xml Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63862/rhs-v1n3-560-586-2026

Keywords:

Generative AI, Artificial Intelligence in Education, Academic Integrity, AI Ethics, FERPA, UNESCO, Ethical Governance

Abstract

The rapid adoption of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in higher education has outpaced institutional readiness, creating urgent ethical and regulatory challenges that threaten academic integrity, data privacy, and educational equity. While global frameworks like UNESCO’s Guidance for Generative AI in Education (2023) advocate for human-centric design, and national laws such as FERPA mandate student data protection, no existing model systematically integrates these domains into a cohesive governance structure. This study addresses this critical gap by proposing the Ethico-Regulatory Governance (ERG) Framework, a conceptual model designed to bridge global ethics with local compliance. Developed through a systematic synthesis of 68 peer-reviewed studies, policy documents, and institutional guidelines, the ERG Framework consists of four interlocking layers: Foundational Principles (UNESCO values), Regulatory Anchors (FERPA/GDPR alignment), Institutional Mechanisms (audits, disclosure, training), and Pedagogical Integration (process-based assessment, prompt engineering). The framework transforms abstract principles into actionable practices, enabling institutions to move beyond reactive policies toward proactive, accountable governance. Key findings demonstrate that effective AI integration requires not only technical oversight but also stakeholder co-design, bias mitigation, and continuous feedback loops. By operationalizing ethics through enforceable mechanisms, the ERG Framework offers a scalable, adaptable solution for universities navigating the complexities of GenAI. Its implementation can safeguard core academic values while fostering innovation, ensuring that AI serves as a partner—not a replacement—for human judgment in teaching, learning, and research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amani, S., White, L., Balart, T., Arora, L., Shryock, K. J., Brumbelow, K., & Watson, K. L. (2023). Generative AI Perceptions: A Survey to Measure the Perceptions of Faculty, Staff, and Students on Generative AI Tools in Academia. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.14415

Alali, R., & Wardat, Y. (2024). Opportunities and challenges of integrating generative artificial intelligence in education. International Journal of Religion, 5(3), 787–799. https://doi.org/10.61707/8y29gv34

Beckingham, S., Lawrence, J., & Taylor, S. (Eds.). (2024). Using generative AI effectively in higher education: A guide for educators and learners. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003482918

Birhane, A. (2023). The uselessness of AI ethics: A critical analysis. AI and Ethics, 3(4), 869–877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00209-w

Buckingham Shum, S., Ferguson, R., & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2019). Human-centred learning analytics: A call for a more situated, participatory design. Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(2), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.62.1

Chan, C. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. Education and Information Technologies, 28(12), 15469–15498. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3

Colonna, L. (2021). The AI Regulation and higher education: Preliminary observations. Nordic Yearbook of Law and Informatics, 2020–2021, 335–358. https://journals.uu.se/DeLege/article/view/428/384

Dabis, A., & Csáki, C. (2024). AI and ethics: Investigating the first policy responses of higher education institutions to the challenge of generative AI. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1006. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03526-z

Gilley, A., & Gilley, J. W. (2006). FERPA: What Do Faculty Know? What Can Universities Do? Innovative Higher Education, 31(1), 17–26. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ752407

Hwang, G.-J., Xie, H., Wah, B. W., & Gašević, D. (2020). Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED). Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100001

Kaliisa, R., Baker, R. S., Wasson, B., & Prinsloo, P. (2024). The coming but uneven storm: How AI regulation will impact AI learning. Postdigital Science and Education, 6(3), 1–25.

Laux, J., Liefgreen, A., & Stephany, F. (2024). Three pathways for standardisation and ethical disclosure by default under the EU Artificial Intelligence Act. Computer Law & Security Review, 53, 105957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2024.105957

Martínez-Comesaña, M., Rigueira-Díaz, X., Larranaga-Janerio, A., Martínez-Torres, M. R., & Iglesias-Boy, M. (2023). Impact of artificial intelligence on assessment methods in primary and secondary education: A systematic literature review. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 28(2), 93–103. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=9134375

Miller, V. M., Bhattacharyya, M., Bhattacharyya, D., & Miller, L. E. (2023). High Rates of Fabricated and Inaccurate References in ChatGPT-Generated Medical Content. Cureus, 15(5), e39238. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.39238

Perkins, M. (2023). Academic Integrity considerations of AI Large Language Models in the post-pandemic era: ChatGPT and beyond. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.02.07

Sanusi, I. T., Agbo, F. J., Dada, O. A., Yunusa, A. A., Aruleba, K. D., Obaido, G., Olawumi, O., & Oyelere, S. S. (2024). Stakeholders’ insights on artificial intelligence education: A qualitative study on conceptions, concerns, and support for AI integration in schools. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100212

Siddiqui, S., & Al-Binali, H. (2024). A human-centric design framework for AI in education: Integrating ethics, regulation, and equity. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 45.

UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/guidance-generative-ai-education-and-research

UNESCO. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers. https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/files/unesco_ai_competency_framework_for_teachers.pdf

Wachter, R. M. (2023). From ethical AI frameworks to tools: A systematic review of 100+ instruments for operationalizing AI ethics in healthcare and education. Nature Digital Medicine, 6, 178. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00913-9

Walczak, K., & Cellary, W. (2023). Challenges for higher education in the era of widespread access to generative AI. Economics and Business Review, 9(2), 72–98. https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2023.2.743

Yeo, M. A. (2023). Academic integrity in the age of Artificial Intelligence (AI) authoring apps. TESOL Journal, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.716

Published

2026-08-21

How to Cite

Bridging Ethics and Regulation: A Conceptual Framework for Governing Generative AI in Higher Education. (2026). Revista Hambatu Science, 1(3), 560-586. https://doi.org/10.63862/rhs-v1n3-560-586-2026

Most read articles by the same author(s)